​In the ongoing debate about salary transparency, Public Sector Units (PSUs) in India may hold the blueprint for what fair and transparent pay can look like. While India Inc. has long been accused of opaque pay practices, PSUs offer a contrasting model—structured, published, and universally applied. In 2025, as more private firms grapple with retention, trust, and pay equity, the PSU framework offers lessons worth examining.

The PSU Advantage: Structured Pay Scales

One of the defining features of India’s public sector is its open and standardized pay structure. From the banking sector (like SBI) to energy giants (ONGC, NTPC), compensation is governed by clear pay bands tied to seniority, tenure, and government pay commissions. These salary ranges are publicly available and form part of recruitment advertisements and promotion guidelines.

Take LIC (Life Insurance Corporation of India) for example. Every year, it releases job postings with explicit salary bands (e.g., ₹53,600 - ₹1,02,090 for AAO roles), allowances, and grade pay. There’s no mystery or negotiation—just transparent frameworks backed by policy. This transparency fosters high levels of internal equity, where employees rarely feel underpaid relative to peers. It also removes bias and pay discrimination from the equation—something the private sector still struggles with, particularly around gender and caste.

Retention and Loyalty: The Silent Wins

PSUs may not offer the same flexibility or innovation as startups, but they score high on employee loyalty and retention. A 2024 People Matters survey noted that PSUs have an average attrition rate below 5%, compared to 18–25% in private IT and BFSI sectors. Salary transparency plays a quiet but significant role here. When employees know what to expect at each level—and that pay raises are based on tenure or exams—they are more likely to trust the system and stay long-term.

Can Private Companies Replicate This?

While not all elements of the PSU model are replicable in private businesses (due to market pressures and role diversity), some principles are increasingly being adopted.

For instance, Accenture India and HCLTech now have formal pay bands and promotion-linked salary matrices that are accessible to HR and line managers. Employees are gradually being educated about how they progress within those bands. Even startups are taking cues. Razorpay now uses performance-linked compensation frameworks that are explained upfront during onboarding. They also share departmental compensation averages with team leads to avoid internal disparities.

Challenges to PSU-Style Transparency

Of course, PSUs are not without flaws. Promotions are often slower, and exceptional performers may feel under-rewarded. In contrast, private companies rely heavily on differentiated compensation to retain top talent—something difficult under a rigid PSU model. Moreover, PSU salaries may lag behind private benchmarks, particularly in high-growth industries like tech or e-commerce. But in terms of equity, fairness, and clarity, the PSU system remains unmatched.

Bridging the Gap

Hybrid models are emerging. Companies like TCS and Infosys use pay bands inspired by PSU-like structures, but add performance incentives and market correction flexibility. These blended systems aim to strike a balance—rewarding excellence while maintaining internal equity.

Conclusion

As India’s workforce becomes increasingly diverse, informed, and vocal in 2025, the call for transparent and equitable compensation practices has grown impossible to ignore. With rising participation from women, professionals from Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities, and individuals from varied socio-economic backgrounds, the traditional, opaque salary structures of the private sector are no longer acceptable to a new generation that demands clarity and fairness. In this environment, Public Sector Units (PSUs)—with their long-standing tradition of standardized pay scales, grade-based promotions, and public disclosure—are emerging as a symbol of accountability and equal opportunity. While private organizations operate under different market dynamics, including performance-based pay and competition for niche talent, they can no longer afford to dismiss the PSU model entirely. What they can do, however, is adopt the underlying principle that makes the PSU system so trusted: transparency. This doesn’t mean duplicating government wage structures, but rather building systems where compensation is guided by clear policies, visible benchmarks, and objective criteria.

Companies that embrace this hybrid approach—combining the clarity of the public sector with the agility of the private sector—will likely lead the way in talent acquisition and retention. After all, transparency breeds trust, and trust is the foundation of high performance and long-term employee loyalty. In the end, the solution for India’s evolving talent economy may not lie in choosing between public and private approaches, but in blending the best of both worlds. A future where salaries are fair, understandable, and openly communicated isn’t just idealistic—it’s increasingly becoming the expectation of a modern, empowered workforce.

Looking for the Right Talent or Your Next Career Move?

At Crescendo Global, we specialize in connecting top-tier talent with leading organizations across industries. Whether you're a company seeking skilled professionals or a candidate looking for the perfect opportunity, our expertise in mid to senior level hiring ensures the best match for your success.

📩For Employers– Partner with us to find exceptional talent that drives your business forward.

💼For Candidates– Explore career-defining roles that align with your skills and aspirations.

💬Write to us atindia@crescendogroup.in/+91-83888-50000

🔗Follow us on LinkedIn, Instagram & YouTube –@CrescendoGlobal